Google Google Ranking SEO

SEO for photographers: websites, social media, and Google Search

Websites vs. Social Media for Photographers

  • Social media (Instagram, Facebook, Bluesky) is useful for exposure but lacks control over presentation.
  • A personal website gives photographers full control over storytelling, branding, and professionalism.
  • For business purposes (e.g., weddings, exhibitions, selling prints), a website is essential as a “digital business card.”

SEO Considerations for Photographers

Branding

  • Using a generic domain (e.g., unterwasser.photo) makes it harder to rank compared to using a personal brand name.
  • Clear identification of the photographer (e.g., “Martin Splitt’s Photography”) improves discoverability.

Search Console

  • Important to monitor queries and impressions, even though it does not directly boost rankings.

Gallery vs. Image Pages

  • Gallery-only setups limit indexing.
  • Individual landing pages for each image, with descriptive text, improve image search visibility.

Content on Galleries

  • Add descriptive text, locations, and context to gallery/category pages to help them rank.

Technical Setup

  • Responsive images (different sizes for devices) are good practice.
  • File size and formats (JPEG is safe; WebP/AVIF are modern alternatives).
  • Core Web Vitals matter but can be secondary for high-resolution photography sites.

Special Cases

  • Stock Photography: SEO overlaps with keywording (titles, tags, demand trends, seasonality).
  • Event/Wedding Photography: Relies heavily on traditional marketing (fairs, planners, referrals) plus clear local SEO (“event photographer London”).
  • Fine Art Photography: Websites often focus on artistic vision, exhibitions, and galleries rather than service-oriented SEO.

Author

bangaree

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *